Trigonometry · Lesson 3 (synthesis) · Pearson Edexcel International A-Level Pure Mathematics 1
This lesson adds no new formula. Instead it builds the skill that exams really test: choosing the right tool, in the right order, from a kit you already own. Here is the whole kit on one page.
| Tool | What it gives you | Reach for it when you know… |
|---|---|---|
| Sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C | a missing side or angle | a side and the angle opposite it, plus one more piece (AAS, ASA, or the SSA "ambiguous" case) |
| Cosine rule a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A | a missing side (or, rearranged, a missing angle) | two sides and the angle between them (SAS), or all three sides (SSS) |
| Area ½ ab sin C | the area of the triangle | two sides and the angle between them |
The single most useful question to ask yourself is: "Do I have a side paired with its opposite angle?" If yes, the sine rule is usually the quickest way in. If not — if your known angle is wedged between two known sides — the sine rule has nothing to grip, and the cosine rule is your starting tool. The diagram below turns that judgement into a flowchart.
Often a problem needs more than one tool in sequence: the cosine rule unlocks a side, that side feeds the sine rule for an angle, and the area formula finishes the job. Recognising which tool comes next is the same judgement applied again and again.
For most of history, the only way to measure something you couldn't walk across — a river, a valley, the distance to a ship at sea — was to turn it into a triangle. Surveyors would pace out one side they could measure (a "baseline"), measure two angles with a theodolite, and let the sine rule hand them the rest. This is triangulation, and it mapped whole countries: the Great Trigonometrical Survey of India spent most of the 19th century chaining triangles across a subcontinent to measure it. The same idea, sped up and satellite-borne, is how your phone's GPS fixes your position right now.
But the tools alone don't solve anything. What surveyors and navigators actually relied on was a way of thinking when the path forward isn't obvious. In 1945 the mathematician George Pólya wrote it down as four plain steps in his book How to Solve It — and they fit a trigonometry problem perfectly:
The diagram-first habit in step 1 is not a nicety — it is where most of the thinking happens. A clear, labelled figure usually shows you which tool fits before you've written any algebra.
Pick one of these and make the reasoning your own — no full solution required, just the thinking:
There's no single right expression here — the goal is to hear yourself reason about choosing, because that's the part an exam can't give you.
Here is a real navigation problem. You'll solve it the way a navigator would — one decision at a time. Each step unlocks only when the previous one is right, and the chart fills in as you go, so you can always see what you know.
The situation. A ship leaves harbour H and sails 15 km on a bearing of 045° to point A. It then turns and sails 11 km on a bearing of 150° to point B. The skipper needs to know how far B is from harbour, what bearing to steer to return straight home, and the area of sea enclosed by the route.
A bearing is measured clockwise from North. Turn the two bearings at A into the actual interior angle ∠HAB of the triangle. (Give your answer in degrees.)
You now know two sides (HA = 15, AB = 11) and the angle between them. Which tool fits? Find HB, to 1 decimal place (km).
Now you have a side (HB) paired with its opposite angle (A) — so the sine rule has something to grip. Find ∠AHB, to 1 decimal place (degrees).
Find the area of triangle HAB, to 1 decimal place (km²).
Investigate with the chart:
The hardest moment in a problem like this is the very first one — the blank-page feeling of "I don't know where to start." That feeling is not a sign you can't do it. It's just the normal gap between reading a problem and seeing into it, and it closes the instant you do one small, concrete thing: draw the triangle and label what you know.
Notice how the workbench never asked you to see the whole solution at once. It asked for one decision at a time. That's a habit you can carry into any problem: you don't need the full route before you take the first step — you need only the next step.
Pause and check in with yourself:
Your task: become the problem-setter. Design one multi-step triangle problem of your own — set in a real context (navigation, surveying, a sports field, a roof truss, anything) — that genuinely needs at least two of the three tools used in sequence. Then write a full model solution that:
Swap with a partner if you can: solving each other's problems is the real test of whether the setup is clear and consistent.
How your work will be assessed — the Haven Maths Rubric:
| Strand | What we're looking for here |
|---|---|
| Conceptual Understanding | You choose tools by the configuration (opposite vs included), not by guesswork, and can justify each choice. |
| Fluency & Accuracy | Correct substitution and algebra; full accuracy carried through; sensible final rounding. |
| Application to Problems | You translate an unstructured, real-world situation (including bearings) into a correctly labelled triangle and a working plan. |
| Independence & Reflection | You design a consistent problem of your own and check that your answer is reasonable ("look back"). |
Ready to build fluency? The practice companion has exam-style questions with Socratic support whenever you get stuck.
✏️ Now Practise →